Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Quotas

  1. #1
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    51

    Post Quotas

    I am very pleased with the replys that I received for patrol zones. Thank you. I have another one. How does everyone feel about setting quotas or goals for a year. Such as, so many tickets, DWI's, and so on and so forth.
    Does this cause pressure? Or is it just a way to get officers to work more efficient. There is a catch however, if you do not meet your quotas you may suffer unknown consequences, obviously ones you may not like. Such as zones you do not prefer.

  2. #2
    Supervisor? Landric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    802

    Post

    Howdy,

    I don't think setting numerical goals is the right way to go. Officers who do their job should have no problem writting "enough" tickets and making "enough" arrests. Simply expect your officers to do their job. My agency doesn't have any quota or number system, but if a cop isn't doing anything, the numbers will suggest that.
    -Landric

    "The Engine could still smile...it seemed to scare them"-Felix

  3. #3
    No Longer Active
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    5,544

    Post

    Quotas are illegal in my state.

    Further, I find them counter-productive. I'm one of those guys that goes out and does my job. If you want to start putting minimum numbers on me, then that's what you get. For example, I used to check doors of businesses all the time. Then they came out with some stupid policy saying that you'd check a minimum of 20 per night and leave a stupid tag hanging on the door. Guess what? That's exactly what they got from me then, 20. No more, no less.

    They also don't take into account the differences in activity between zones, shifts etc.

    And they're a publicity nightmare.

  4. #4
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    12

    Post

    We used to have a quota, but now the chief lets us write all we want..... just a joke.

    Seriously though, I find it hard to set a quota in this line of work. If things are slow, they're slow. A quota works in a factory but I just can't see setting a baseline for these types of things. Just my opinion.
    Just my opinion, I could be wrong...

  5. #5
    Center City Bike Cop LBomb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Phila.,Pa. U.S.A.
    Posts
    252

    Post

    Quotas are a no-no here.
    "The streets of Philadelphia are safe...it's the people that make them unsafe"---Frank Rizzo
    http://hometown.aol.com/ppd9886/PhillyCopSpot.html

  6. #6
    Senior Veteran
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Strategically located between NY and Miami
    Posts
    2,723

    Post

    Quotas are illegal here-I guess I assumed they were everywhere.
    People have more fun than anybody.

  7. #7
    Senior Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Near Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    711

    Post

    Quotas are illegal in Texas also. There have been some big brass in the Dallas area get fired over setting " informal " quotas.
    RADAR is the 8th wonder of the world.

  8. #8
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    SLC, UT
    Posts
    140

    Post

    Quotas may be illegal but they are implied and enforced in my dept. I have co-workers with letters in their files for not writing enough tickets to meet expectations. I think that's ChickenS4it.

  9. #9
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    51

    Post

    The implied quota is what I was getting at. However, some officers are being punished for not meeting this implied quota.

  10. #10
    Senior Veteran
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    339

    Post

    I'm one of those guys that doesn't like being forced into anything. I consider myself a very proactive Police Officer. I just don't like someone telling me that I have to write a certain number of tickets, or making a certain number of citizen contacts, etc..

    I'm with Nite. I do the bare minimum if someone tells me that I have to do something. When they just leave me alone, I tend to be more productive.

    Also, we don't have quotas either. However, our supervisors are always pushing some type of quota, as in the "implied" one.
    Attitude is a reflection of leadership.

  11. #11
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Southeastern PA
    Posts
    352

    Post

    In the absence of numerical production standards, police management is often at a loss when it comes time to evaluate performance, both their own and that of their employees. Every other evaluation method requires a degree of subjectivity that will inevitably be subjected to challenge and dispute.

    Numbers are popular because they are easy to record and they are objectively verifiable. Conversely, they are unpopular because they do not accurately reflect the attainment of police objectives..

    Police work is much different than a manufacturing facility and it is not fairly quantifiable as a service provider. Our goals and accomplshments, for the most part, reflect intangible ideals. A careful reading of a few random mission statements will make this fact obvious. How does one measure, for instance, a "reduced fear of crime".

    Customer surveys don't really work well for us. Production quotas are only marginally applicable to the arbitrary circumstances of policing and are viewed with justifiable suspicion by the public.

    In some rspects, setting activiity quotas for police is akin to setting fire quotas for firemen or sunny day quotas for weathermen.

    But I digress...., supervisors are always going to look at numbers as part of an officer's overall performance. An officer that want's to be perceived as a good worker will consequently produce numbers. The process doesn't hold up very well under scrutiny, so we try not to think about it too much and we certainly know not to use the word "quota".

  12. #12
    Senior Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Northwest suburban Chicago
    Posts
    562

    Post

    I see nothing wrong with a standard, not a quota.

    Quotas denote a means to increase revenue. That is why quotas per se are illegal in many states. Here in Illinois there is a case that went all the way to the supreme court. It is Beggs V Park Ridge.

    Beggs was a slug that refused to do anything. Park Ridge had an activity standard of 0.8 tickets per day. Based upon the number of accidents and the high volume of vehicular traffic ( Next to Chicago O'Hare Airport) they started disciplinary action. The FOP fought it and he refused to write tickets. He lost and was discharged.
    The court in Beggs rules that a production standard so low was not against the public interest.

    The average patrol officer on the street should be able to come up with one moving violation per shift. Traffic accident investigation, every deputy's take home squad had a moving radar unit. Some months your write an average of a ticket a day the next it may be above or below. The yearly average of 240 days working (AVERAGE) should work out. Shifts need to be taken into account also. Obviously the Midnight shift does not have a traffic presence as much as the day or afternoon shift.

    Sparky is also right. If you impose a standard, the officers will meet the standard and nothing more. We look for a well rounded activity. Some many tickets, so many warrants, so many papers all which directly relates to the ratio of discretionary time the officer has.

    A police officers job is very hard to fairly evaluate because it is very subjective. Some quantitative measure is often necessary since job performance is so hard to measure.

    I am against QUOTAS...reasonable performance standard do not offend me.

    [ 02-03-2002: Message edited by: Guard Dog ]
    "The view only changes for the lead dog." ~ Sergeant Preston of The Yukon ~

  13. #13
    207
    207 is offline
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    2,220

    Post

    Originally posted by Guard Dog:

    Here in Illinois there is a case that went all the way to the supreme court. It is Beggs V Park Ridge.

    Beggs was a slug that refused to do anything. Park Ridge had an activity standard of 0.8 tickets per day. Based upon the number of accidents and the high volume of vehicular traffic ( Next to Chicago O'Hare Airport) they started disciplinary action. The FOP fought it and he refused to write tickets. He lost and was discharged.
    The court in Beggs rules that a production standard so low was not against the public interest.
    I read through the case, not only was Beggs inept in doing his job he didn't like to show up for work either.
    He has to be a real moron to put in 18 years of service only to get fired.

    We have one of those "slugs".. a dispatcher that hasn't worked a day this year.
    " Life's disappointments are harder to take when you don't know any swear words." - Calvin

  14. #14
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    579

    Post

    Officers SHOULD be expected to have a certain level of performance OVER TIME. Unless there is a good reason, full time officers who only write a dozen or so tickets a year are not being pro-active enough. Of course, some agencies are so busy they don't give the average officer much time for regular, routine traffic enforcement.

    The problem with the Q word is that too many admin types can't seem to evaluate officer performance outside the tangible number of tickets their oficers write. You could have 12 domestics a night and write 10 reports every day, but they want to see those tickets when it comes time to evaluate you!

  15. #15
    Jay
    Jay is offline
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NE TX
    Posts
    21

    Post

    The biggest problem that I have seen with quotas is that it leads to B.S. tickets. Quotas are illegal in Texas, but that doesn't stop many agencies. Our State police operate on a "point" system, which basically equates to a quota. Most of the departments here are "at will employment", so if you don't meet whatever quota, point system, or whatever, you're gone with very little, if any, recourse. Quotas also prohibit much of the officers discretionary ability, especailly if the officer is short of the "goals", "quotas", "points", or whatever.
    Jay

  16. #16
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    81

    Post

    In California, quotas are illegal.

    There was a time when the administration struggled with this whole issue on how to properly evaluate a deputy.

    What it boiled down to was, they decided to grade each person on what they DO, not what they DON'T do.

  17. #17
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    362

    Post

    At my dept were expected to write a ticket a day. But we don't have radar guns (the patrol guys might not take care of them) so were stuck with finding other stuff. Well during a busy shift with only a little time between calls that means I have to find a non speeding traffic infraction worth writing. Failure to signal is a chicken***** ticket. I'll stop people for it looking for drunks but I never write it. Sometimes you just don't see stop sign or red light violations in your shift. So even the ticket a shift thing is bogus sometimes.

  18. #18
    Forum Member H8Criminals's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    good 'ole US of A
    Posts
    207

    Post

    No quotas here either (per se) ,however, we have "monthly stats" posted. It shows the officers' names in roster format, how many cases, criminal complaints, moving cites, other cites, arrests and I think one more thing. It's idea is to get officers to encourage each other to do better. I don't particularly like it though, because it doesn't show adjustments for vacations or when officers are instructing in FTO. Those stats during FTO go to the new officers, not toward the trainer. Some people like it, I personally don't, but I'm not a supervisor. Oh yeah, the top 3 numbers in each category are highlighted with the number 1, 2 or 3 next to the top 3. If there is a tie, then both are highlighted and numbered and a "t" is included to show a tie. Ugh.
    I want to die in my sleep like my grandfather ... not screaming and yelling like the passengers in his car.

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Union County NJ
    Posts
    117

    Post

    In NJ quotas were outlawed in a bill signed by the governor two years ago...However everyone knows...if you are on the list for a day off and the captain can give that extra person off.".But Officer Smith, I see your quality of lifers are down this month", Not enough public drinkers or juvenile curfew tickets"," You still want that day off" God forbid you get a complaint while doing these things.....Then the captain is on you for that.....You cant win

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •