Thread: New tech for hot pursuits?
-
08-10-2009, 06:48 PM #1Forum Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Tennessee
- Posts
- 150
New tech for hot pursuits?
Watching the news today was sad seeing children killed in a crash that could have been prevented. This pursuit is likely to bring on new calls to stop pursuits, but what message would that send criminals? Green light??? Sure! So it seems we have to figure out something better than the pitt to take someone out.
Any ideas for better tech?Last edited by Sgt York; 08-10-2009 at 07:03 PM.
Thank you to all of you who serve as men and women in law enforcement - we sleep better at night because of your dedication to duty!
-
08-10-2009, 07:01 PM #2Forum Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Tennessee
- Posts
- 150
Instead of a grader:
How about a harpoon in the form a flexible magnetic patch that adhere's to any metal part of a vehicle, and sends a very high blast of electrical current that lasts just long enough to destroy the vehicle PCM but not long enough to kill or injure the occupants.
This unit could be deployed through the front end of a cruiser and attach to any part of the suspect vehicle, send an electric charge immediately then disconnect from the vehicle and reel back into the cruiser, or remain attached to the vehicle and safely remain to act as a brake until the vehicle stops.Thank you to all of you who serve as men and women in law enforcement - we sleep better at night because of your dedication to duty!
-
08-10-2009, 07:31 PM #3
The technology has existed for years that would enable police to disable the engine of the vehicle that was fleeing. Guess what..the ACLU objected. It is the homegrown terrorists that are killing our civilians, not us.
September 11, 2001 - All gave some, some gave all. Never forget -- Never forgive.......... RIP Brothers and Sisters.
-
08-10-2009, 07:39 PM #4
-
08-10-2009, 07:54 PM #5
What does ACLU stand for anyway. Isn't it Anti Cops & Lawyers (meaning Prosecutors)Union?
-
08-10-2009, 07:56 PM #6
*** **** ***** *****
It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others.
-
08-10-2009, 08:01 PM #7
The technology to stop a car without injuring people exists, and it doesn't have to be installed in the car (unlike On-Star, which I will NEVER EVER own). It sends an electro-magnetic pulse that fries out the car's electronics, stopping it without hurting anyone inside. Problem is, it's expensive, and they have to perfect making it shut down the bad-guy car without taking out other cars around it (including the LEO's cruiser), which would make things more dangerous. Give it a few years and I suspect it will be tested on the streets. Until then, I don't see the situation getting any easier for LEOs.
If I tell you what I know, I'd have to kill you. Fortunately, I don't know much.
-
08-10-2009, 08:02 PM #8
American Criminal Liberties Union
September 11, 2001 - All gave some, some gave all. Never forget -- Never forgive.......... RIP Brothers and Sisters.
-
08-10-2009, 08:08 PM #9
the problem with shutting off an engine while the vehicle is moving is that the steering and braking systems are adversely affected. If you can kill the transmission or rear gears while not disabling the engine, that would be the sweet spot. I heard that some vehicle manufacturers will be installing something in their drive trains to enable such a pursuit intervention system. The problem with those is that they can almost always be overcome relatively easily.
Hidden Content
Hidden Content Originally Posted by SmurfetteHidden Content Originally Posted by DAL
-
08-10-2009, 08:36 PM #10Forum Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- NC
- Posts
- 1,323
-
08-10-2009, 09:43 PM #11
It would work IF we caught them before they could have a chance to bypass the system. I think it's a GREAT idea, and would work as intended most of the time. As the old saying goes, "If it would prevent just 1 life being lost, it would be worth the cost."
Hidden Content
Hidden Content Originally Posted by SmurfetteHidden Content Originally Posted by DAL
-
08-10-2009, 10:58 PM #12Macho Man
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- fl
- Posts
- 10,594
-
08-10-2009, 11:17 PM #13Your Daddy
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Start at the Pacific and drive east til you lose teeth and hear banjos
- Posts
- 854
I saw on Futureweapons, a net that works kinda like spikes. The difference is the net wraps around the front wheels and locks them up. The car stops in its tracks.
I thought of one a few years ago. How about a sky crane with an electro magnet. It drops the magnet on top of the car and takes off. Now you got this car dangling under a helicopter. The pilot can then let him down in a caged area at the station, or my favorite, drop him off in the nearest lake or ocean.God made perfect cops.......The rest he put in cars.
-
08-10-2009, 11:25 PM #14Macho Man
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- fl
- Posts
- 10,594

It's a popup barrier if you need to stop something on the highway and the ACLU wont be in the way, stick it on a trailer.. put it on the road.. you'll have a surefire stop method.. or go for a couple more feet. Contact me if your department is interested, I've already got a model as to how it'd work. They have them in the ground at various places in Washington D.C. they popup at a moments notice and can stop a truck.Last edited by Taylor13; 08-10-2009 at 11:28 PM.
-
08-10-2009, 11:32 PM #15
Looks like that truck was going faster than the posted 5 MPH....
Hidden Content
Hidden Content Originally Posted by SmurfetteHidden Content Originally Posted by DAL
-
08-11-2009, 04:47 AM #16Forum Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- missouri
- Posts
- 221
Run from the police =DEADLY FORCE
That would stop them from starting, or end them when they start
-
08-11-2009, 09:38 AM #17Forum Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Inet393
- Posts
- 1,743
-
08-11-2009, 10:05 AM #18
A little common sense, please!!
Why are some departments still pursuing for traffic offenses, misdemeanors, or even non-violent felonies such as auto theft??

From personal experience,years ago, as an auto theft detective, most people received more time for a DUI than stealing a car....
The circumstances MUST be weighed!!
We only are allowed to pursue for VIOLENT felonies, or crimes involving guns!! It seems to work fine. We still catch the bad guys, and pursuits and their related carnage have all but disappeared.
Last edited by grumpyirishman; 08-11-2009 at 10:15 AM.
"We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm" -George Orwell
"It's 106 miles to Chicago, we've got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark, and we're wearing diapers." - Blues Brothers
-
08-11-2009, 12:51 PM #19
We only chase for crimes against persons, violent felonies, etc. Property crimes we do not chase for.
Hidden Content
Hidden Content Originally Posted by SmurfetteHidden Content Originally Posted by DAL
-
08-11-2009, 12:54 PM #20Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- South Sioux City, NE
- Posts
- 4,305
-
08-11-2009, 01:15 PM #21Forum Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Arkansas
- Posts
- 30
Pursuits are a no win situation.
See a guy run a stop sign, light him up and he takes off. Now he's going 100mph blowing through red lights to get away. You have already terminated the pursuit because it is not a violent felony. At the next intersection he, still trying to flee from you, T-Bones a minivan and kills the entire family.
You're going to get sued for not persuing him, for not attempting to disable his vehicle, for not being right behind him so that your lights and sirens might warn other motorists of the impending danger.
-
08-11-2009, 02:09 PM #22
-
08-11-2009, 02:36 PM #23
-
08-11-2009, 09:53 PM #24The posts on this forum by this poster are of his personal opinion, and his personal opinion alone
"Politicians are like diapers. They need to be changed often and for the same reason"
"We fight not for glory; nor for wealth; nor honor, but only and alone we fight for freedom, which no good man surrenders but with his life"
-
08-12-2009, 11:27 PM #25
If only someone would invent a device that were capable of taking a small dense projectile, or perhaps even a cluster of projectiles, and hurling it accurately over a short distance. Perhaps some sort of smokeless powder could be utilized as a propellant. That might work.
I miss you, Dave.
Hidden Content



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





