amw2
09-15-2005, 04:40 PM
Hey everyone, I've been reading this forum for a few weeks now and figured it was time to post a question of my own.
I've been working retail Loss Prevention for almost a year now, and as I put more thought into becoming a reserve police officer after law school, I find myself wondering if I'll have any issues regarding the "creative writing" I've always been told to use in writing apprehension reports.
Most retailers require Loss Prevention to possess a number of elements before making a shoplifting apprehension, among them witnessing the subject actually select the merchandise. In many cases we don't see the person early enough to see selection, but have everything else to indicate a shoplift. As a typical example, we don't see the subject select 8 pairs of Levi's Jeans, but see him go to a secluded corner, pull an empty bag out of his coat, bag the pants, and then quickly walk out the door.
In these cases, it is standard for the store detective to write in his report that he actually did witness selection of the merchandise, since without this element charges usually won't be filed and the store will come after him for not following policy. This is common in every retail Loss Prevention dept. I've ever known, and everyone from store detectives to regional managers knows this is how it is done. I've also had officers hint that they know our reports might have filled in a blank or two, but have never had a problem. I have no doubt they know how this works as well.
My question is, will this way of writing reports be a problem when I apply for a reserve officer position? I know it might come under an example of "Not Following Policy", but it seems to be the common sense and normal way of doing things for most retail Loss Prevention. It's next to impossible to follow all the guidelines perfectly, and I've had a shoplifter with $1,200 worth of merchandise go free with a trespass notice because I played it perfectly straight and wrote that I had not actually witnessed selection of anything, although anyone with a drop of common sense could take one look at the videotape and tell what was going on.
I should clarify that it is not as though we make up the report from start to finish, just the area where selection actually occurred. I'm also not referring to creatively writing reports if I were to become a reserve PO, only the reports that I currently write as a store detective.
I've been working retail Loss Prevention for almost a year now, and as I put more thought into becoming a reserve police officer after law school, I find myself wondering if I'll have any issues regarding the "creative writing" I've always been told to use in writing apprehension reports.
Most retailers require Loss Prevention to possess a number of elements before making a shoplifting apprehension, among them witnessing the subject actually select the merchandise. In many cases we don't see the person early enough to see selection, but have everything else to indicate a shoplift. As a typical example, we don't see the subject select 8 pairs of Levi's Jeans, but see him go to a secluded corner, pull an empty bag out of his coat, bag the pants, and then quickly walk out the door.
In these cases, it is standard for the store detective to write in his report that he actually did witness selection of the merchandise, since without this element charges usually won't be filed and the store will come after him for not following policy. This is common in every retail Loss Prevention dept. I've ever known, and everyone from store detectives to regional managers knows this is how it is done. I've also had officers hint that they know our reports might have filled in a blank or two, but have never had a problem. I have no doubt they know how this works as well.
My question is, will this way of writing reports be a problem when I apply for a reserve officer position? I know it might come under an example of "Not Following Policy", but it seems to be the common sense and normal way of doing things for most retail Loss Prevention. It's next to impossible to follow all the guidelines perfectly, and I've had a shoplifter with $1,200 worth of merchandise go free with a trespass notice because I played it perfectly straight and wrote that I had not actually witnessed selection of anything, although anyone with a drop of common sense could take one look at the videotape and tell what was going on.
I should clarify that it is not as though we make up the report from start to finish, just the area where selection actually occurred. I'm also not referring to creatively writing reports if I were to become a reserve PO, only the reports that I currently write as a store detective.