IPDBrad
11-05-2003, 12:14 PM
A big controversy erupted this year in Indiana, when the new property tax reassessment came out.
In a nutshell, Township assessors place a value on each home, then a portion of that value is assessed for tax purposes (I think they credit each home something like 32,000--thus the more expensive the home the lower the credit is as a % of the home value).
This has created a huge controversey as older homes have seen their taxes increase by huge margins, as they were being undervalued.
I have heard other states base the property tax on a market value, what does your state do?
My thought is that the property tax should be bases on build or purchase price and should be frozen until a new homeowner purchases the property. Then the tax would be based on the new purchase price. Thus, the homeowner knows what taxes will be paid, and can budget for it without any surprises. The tax would thus be fixed for the current homeowner.
Some people argue that if someone has a home that has doubled in value they should pay the extra tax, however, I feel this is inherently unfair as they aren't making any money on the increase in their investment until they sell.
In a nutshell, Township assessors place a value on each home, then a portion of that value is assessed for tax purposes (I think they credit each home something like 32,000--thus the more expensive the home the lower the credit is as a % of the home value).
This has created a huge controversey as older homes have seen their taxes increase by huge margins, as they were being undervalued.
I have heard other states base the property tax on a market value, what does your state do?
My thought is that the property tax should be bases on build or purchase price and should be frozen until a new homeowner purchases the property. Then the tax would be based on the new purchase price. Thus, the homeowner knows what taxes will be paid, and can budget for it without any surprises. The tax would thus be fixed for the current homeowner.
Some people argue that if someone has a home that has doubled in value they should pay the extra tax, however, I feel this is inherently unfair as they aren't making any money on the increase in their investment until they sell.