View Full Version : TASER size comparison X3 vs. X26
Sgt. Slaughter
09-23-2009, 09:13 AM
This is just a visual comparison for size of the X3 vs. X26. I didn't bust out the calipers or rulers and take measurements, but I've had many people asking about this very issue, "How big is it, because it LOOKS huge!" Well, the X3 is a bit larger than the X26. However, it does contain newer technology and circuitry to work those 3 deployment bays. It also is waterproof. Now, people that go diving should not carry thing to ward off any sharks, but if you have concerns at your agency about water-related issues, it definitely may be worth checking into the new ECD.
NOTE: Remember, as far as the size goes, the X26 did not have any cartridges loaded onto it. Also, the X3 gets no larger as its cartridges are completely contained in the device.
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e398/psychopyrat/TASER1.jpg
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e398/psychopyrat/TASER2.jpg
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e398/psychopyrat/TASER3.jpg
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e398/psychopyrat/TASER4.jpg
fencipede
09-23-2009, 10:43 AM
Point of Observation: In these photos, the X26 does not have the cartridge on the front.
Is the X3 loaded with the cartridge in these photos? If not, is the unloaded length still very similar to the loaded length?
All in all, looks a bit larger but with 3 times the fun.
Sgt. Slaughter
09-23-2009, 11:01 AM
Sorry. I had that info in another forum and forgot to transfer it here. It's been added in the OP.
.
Yeah, the thing is huge. And it's holster is also huge.
We joked at work that you would need to carry it over your shoulder like a sword.
I will just stick to the X26.
(Not like I have a choice. lol)
I currently carry my X26 on a Aspen Mills taser pants. But the new X3 would most likely be too big for that. Maybe even uncomfortable with a drop holster, it's that big and un-wieldly.
.
Tornado Alley
09-25-2009, 12:54 PM
That looks too bulky for me. I will stick to the x26. I dont see how someone with a slim build could wear that comfortably. I am glad my dept is too poor to switch to this right now!
Resq14
09-26-2009, 11:58 AM
For agencies tight on money looking to adopt TASERs, I'd rather have 100% of employees equipped with X26's vs. 50% with X3's, based on cost.
And it's even bigger than I thought it would be, even though it does have some nice features. Thanks for the comparison!
ACS1719
09-26-2009, 03:25 PM
Id prefer to see them redesign and update the technology of the X26 so that the cartridge is static resistant and maybe give us a few other cool upgrades and just stick with that.
Realistically, I have always been a firm believer in the fact that if you are in a use of force situation where you have 3 people, all demonstrating the level of force requiring the deployment of a taser (which for us is now highly assaultive).... you prolly should have had your gun out already. Its pretty easy to articulate 3 assaultive subjects as being a GBH/death situation.
Just reviewing the number of options and gagets on this new taser it almost gives me the impression that it would be difficult to use under stress.
We should be sticking to the "Keep it simple, Stupid" ideology here and not adding more room to mess up.
Sgt. Slaughter
09-26-2009, 06:20 PM
Now, it's highly possible that they'll be able to alter the size of the unit later on. Technology is a wonderful thing after all.
The new X3 cartridges are static discharge-proof.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDFzxfWidk4
Part of the science built into the X3 has yet to be seen, really. In the future it will be able to sync with the TASER AXON computer via an RF module. Right now it has the ability to refine each individual pulse, making the cycle even more...umm..."meaningful" to the person riding the lightning.
There is only so much you can do to "upgrade" an existing platform before you need to outlay money and facility space to built an entirely new device. TASER software for the X26 is currently at Version 22. That's only within the past 6 years.
.
Supposedly the headset camera is becoming more popular and being used in Europe right now.
Damned if I'm going to wear a headset camera 10 hours a day so everything I do is monitored.
.
Sgt. Slaughter
09-27-2009, 01:54 AM
It doesn't work that way. The AXON is operated by the officer, turned on and off at will.
It doesn't work that way. The AXON is operated by the officer, turned on and off at will.
Yeah.......don't be surprised if "policy" states it's on during every encounter.
:mad:
dspcop
09-29-2009, 03:05 AM
looks bigger than the M-26!
Sgt. Slaughter
09-29-2009, 09:35 AM
Possibly. Although the X3 doesn't feel like you're holding a 2x4.
jswwjw
09-29-2009, 02:02 PM
Holy Crap that thing is big
Sgt. Slaughter
09-29-2009, 02:17 PM
Ain't the first time I heard that. :)
5iveoh
09-29-2009, 05:12 PM
http://101tees.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/thats-what-she-said-300x300.jpg
I assume that Taser has done the marketing research, but my impression is that size was a big -- perhaps the major -- factor in making the X26 so much more successful than the M26. The size of the X3 is a major drawback, as is its price.
Sgt. Slaughter
09-29-2009, 06:29 PM
Could be a combination. Technology upgrade from the M26 to the X26 was excellent as is the X26 to the X3.
Nothing is ever perfect. However, it seems that 'size matters' in this regard.
Could be a combination. Technology upgrade from the M26 to the X26 was excellent as is the X26 to the X3.
Nothing is ever perfect. However, it seems that 'size matters' in this regard.
Unless the technology is bulky, which seems improbable, it could be incorporated into a newer version of the X26. Didn't you post something about new programming for the X26?
A lot of officers did not like having to carry the M26 in a floppy thigh holster, and barely have room for an X26 on their duty belts.
vBulletin® v3.6.7, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.